Shantabai v. state of bombay air 1958 sc 532

Author: husn

August undefined, 2024

WebbShantabai v. State of Bombay, AIR 1958 SC 532 ISSUE: Is a tree an immovable property and what is the distinction between the tree and standing timber? What is the distinction … WebbState of Bombay & Ors [1958] INSC 25 (24 March 1958) Shrimati Shantabai Vs. State of Bombay & Ors [1958] INSC 25 (24 March 1958) 1958 Latest Caselaw 25 SC. Section 105. TPA, Lease defined. By an unregistered document the husband of the petitioner granted her the right to take and appropriate all kinds of wood from certain forests in his Zamindary.

1965 ALLMR ONLINE 421 (S.C.), Anwar Khan Mehboob CoPetitioner v.State …

Webb500 Words Case Analysis of Shanta Bai v. State of Bombay, 1958. The case revolved around petitioner A whose husband B, the owner of a forest, has executed an … WebbCase Law PROPERTY. LAW Presentation RAINA DUA Case Details Case Name Shrimati Shantabai vs State of Bombay. Case 1958 AIR SC Citation 532. Court Supreme Court Facts The petitioners husband Balirambhau doye was a zamindar of Pandharpur . On 26t April 1948 he executed an unregistered document that called itself a lease in favor of his wife . east devon garden waste collection

Transfer of Property Law - Property Law Essays - LawAspect.com

WebbComments on: Shantabai v. State of Bombay, AIR 1958 SC 532 WebbSMT. Shantabai vs state of Bombay (AIR 1958 SC 532) The court held that right to enter the land, cut and carry away wood over a period of 12 years is benefit arising out of land and hence immovable property. Facts: By an unregistered document the husband of the petitioner granted her Webb11 apr. 1991 · State of Bombay (AIR 1958 SC 532), Hindi...), Smt. Shantabai v. State of Bombay ( AIR 1958 SC 532 ), and Chhotabhai Jethabhai Patel and Co. v. S.... ( AIR 1977 … east devon hatoc

Part -1(Case analysis) Smt SHANTABAI v. STATE OF BOMBAY AIR …

Shantabai v. State of Bombay, AIR 1958 SC 532 – Trace Your Case

Webbi) Shantabai v State of Bombay The petitioner’s husband, Balirambhau Doye, was the Zamindar of Pandharpur. On April 26, 1948, he executed an unregistered document, that called itself a lease, in favour of his wife, the petitioner. The deed gives her the right to enter upon certain areas in the zamindari in order to cut and take out Webb16 sep. 2016 · State of Bombay, AIR 1958 SC 532) determining whether the tree is movable or immovable, the intention of the party is important if the parties intend that the tree should continue to have the benefit of further nutriment to be afforded by soil, the tree is immovable property. cubis itWebb25 maj 2024 · The Court is disabled from using the instrument as evidence and hence it goes out of consideration in this case, hook, line and sinker (vide Shantabai v. State of Bombay [AIR 1958 SC 532 : 1959 SCR 265], Satish Chand Makhan v. Govardhan Das Byas [(1984) 1 SCC 369] cubish meaning

"WebbState of Bombay – AIR 1958 SC 532. This case was a landmark case that laid down the test to determine when timber trees are standing timber and when they are immovable … " - Shantabai v. state of bombay air 1958 sc 532

Shantabai v. state of bombay air 1958 sc 532

SHANTABAI V. STATE OF BOMBAY Movable & Immovable …

Webb16 juli 2024 · Smt. Shantabai v. State of Bombay AIR 1958 SC 532 indiankanoon.org link casemine.com link legitquest.com link Headnote Petn. No. 104 of 1957 decided on … WebbState of Bombay, 1959 SCR 265 = AIR 1958 SC 532 where similar questions as are involved in the instant case were examined. It was laid down therein that rights conferred under the contracts, which were substantially similar to those that are in question before us, partook of the nature of interest in immovable property.

Did you know?

Webb3 mars 2024 · In the case of Smt.Shantabai v. State of Bombay [19], the court held that the right to enter the land, cut and carry away wood over a period of 12 years is a benefit arising out of land and hence immovable property. In the case of Anand Bahera v. Province of Orissa [20], it was held that profit emerging out of land is movable property. WebbSHANTABAI V. STATE OF BOMBAY Movable & Immovable Property Transfer of Property act By Bhawna Hey everyone, i am Bhawna Vishwakarma and welcome to Bhawn...

Webb1959 SCR 265 : AIR 1958 SC 532. In the Supreme Court of India (BEFORE SUDHI RANJAN DAS, C.J. AND T.L. VENKATARAMA AIYAR, SUDHANSHU KUMAR DAS, A.K. SARKAR … WebbIn Shantabai v. State of Bombay, 1959 SCR 265: (AIR 1958 SC 532) petitions similar to those in Chhotahai Jethabhai's case met a different fate. Shantabai who claimed the benefit of Art. 19 (1) (f) and (g) had been given a right by her husband to take and appropriate all kinds of wood from his Zamindari forests. The document was unregistered.

WebbIn the case of Smt.Shantabai v. State of Bombay [19], the court held that the right to enter the land, cut and carry away wood over a period of 12 years is a benefit arising out of land and hence immovable property. In the case of Anand Bahera v. Province of Orissa [20], it was held that profit emerging out of land is movable property.

http://idtc-icai.s3.amazonaws.com/download/knowledgeShare18-19/Applicability-GST-trading-TDR.pdf

WebbAbout Press Copyright Contact us Creators Advertise Developers Terms Privacy Policy & Safety How YouTube works Test new features NFL Sunday Ticket Press Copyright ... east devon golf club feesWebb30 juni 2024 · State of Bombay AIR 1958 SC 532 Legal Maxim Home Shantabai v. State of Bombay AIR 1958 SC 532 Facts A, the owner of a forest, executed an unregistered … east devon green waste collectionWebbSmt. Shantabai v/s State of Bombay and Others Petition No. 104 of 1957 Decided On, 24 March 1958 At, Supreme Court of India By, HON'BLE JUSTICE S. R. DASS (CJI) By, … east devon golf courseWebbShantabai v. State of Bombay & Ors., AIR 1958 SC 532. 3 f Certain restrictions are put on the cutting, and the felling of certain trees is prohibited. That is the substance of the … east devon golf club websiteWebb14 maj 2024 · Part -1 (Case analysis) Smt SHANTABAI v. STATE OF BOMBAY AIR 1958 SC 532 LegalKarona 1.29K subscribers Subscribe 2K views 2 years ago Amit kumar singh … cubism 4 viewer for unity .exeWebbi) Shantabai v State of Bombay. The petitioner’s husband, Balirambhau Doye, was the Zamindar of Pandharpur. On April 26, 1948, he. executed an unregistered document, that … cubism 2 typesWebbShantabai v. State of Bombay AIR 1958 SC 532 Registration and Stamp Duty Transfer Kenneth Solomon v. Dan Singh Bawa AIR 1986 Del. General Rules Muniswamy v. K. Venkataswamy AIR 2001 Kant. 24 Zoroastrian Co-operative Housing Society Ltd. V. District Registrar, Co-op. Societies (Urban) (2005) 5 SCC 632 east devon health visitors